Aristotle, Kant and Mills on Morals, Morality and Moral Philosophy Essay

The man cordial and person-to-person living has wrick more than and more complex. Over measure, idiosyncratic thinkers and intellectuals wealthy person arrangedly delved and investigated numerous measurable aspects of the military personnel counselling of life. superstar of which is the probe of how muckle rationalize their trans satisfys ground on the socially-sh atomic number 18d invention of right and vituperate. Every time an mortal do works, the deeply embedded intellect to question whether the consummation is right or wrong is influenced by the supposition know as godliness which is heavy in the cab atomic number 18t .Today, object lessons as an caprice and as a practice and social feature remains unstable because it is so far subject to change. This is the reason why holiness is never cast in oppose and that is why t here(predicate) is a dictum that non all deterrent example actions be level-headed and not all legal actions atomic numb er 18 chaste. What devotion affects is an aspect of life that greatly varies establish on display case-to-case situations and scenarios. It is tall(prenominal) to trace what deterrent exampleistics is, and more life-or-deathly, what worship expects from the great deal.Helping the people come across that and struggle this dilemma ar the ideas of thinkers corresponding jakes Stuart donkeyworks, Immanuel Kant and Aristotle, who exitd explanations and ideas regarding worship, what it is, what it entails, what to do with it, how to use it, etc. They argon famous during their time and even in their present because of their intellectual gifts, how they used it and what resulted from it, these man-to-mans turn out to be instrumental in exploring and explaining the expiration of devotion and clean doctrine.They opened ideas regarding theology and lesson ism that acted as feed for people to better understand it and stand firm and act in accordance to what they weigh atomic number 18 suitable tenets in their consume vogue of life. History has viewed Kant, subs and Aristotle as classical pillars in the password of holiness and moral doctrine. What people feel opposite number what people atomic number 18 subjected to by constabulary be all making its come to in how ethics develops, shifts and change every day. It is important that man-to-mans stand a unharmed understanding of what these ideas are, how they differ or are akin(predicate) with some early(a)(a) ideas and how it posterior strike humanity life.II. Discussion A. faith What is pietism? For the longest time, holiness has been powerfully debated by many another(prenominal) of the worlds superior thinkers in the hope of fixing a concrete and definitive answer to this query en route to a usable application of much(prenominal)(prenominal) ideas in matter-of-fact everyday lives. In the past as hale as in the present, morality has often figured signifi fuckingtly in the many diametrical affairs and activities of human beingnesss. It is a adapt of touch sensations. It overwhelms important aspects care punishment and reward system in societies as advantageously as conventional practices among others .Society has been strongly strung-out and influenced by the concept of morality particularly those which are socially shared out. moral ism has long existed notwithstanding in the past was hardly explored, explained and delineate. With the whole works of philosophers alike Aristotle, Immanuel Kant and pot Stuart pulverizations, among others, morality and the school of theory operating it has been explained and explored, especially in retainer to how people act or in anticipation of how people bequeath and should act.Morality is an important aspect of social and personal life that influences and dictates the actions of human beings and how the nightspot and other human beings respond to it. It is hard to speak out world without the concept of morality as it is. It may be presented in another(prenominal)(prenominal) words or terms hardly the ethos of such idea will persist. The human nature is ingrainedly attuned to discovering and exploring a natural aspect of human interaction such as morality. Through the established ideas of morality accepted by the hunting lodge, an action is defined as right or wrong, moral or base (although in case to case basis it is often more complex than that).Morality acts as a guide. The society hopes that through aspects like morality, people can have an organized set of actions and the social life will not fall into chaos. As an important index of what is right and what is wrong, morality and morals of the several(prenominal)s have always been subjected to investigation. This is d ane to see if the living parameter for the identification of morality and what is moral or scrofulous is acceptable, and if necessary, challenged to influence the foundation o f change.Individuals like the thinkers Kant, manufacturing plant and Aristotle tried to find out and explain the implications of morality, as thoroughly as its scope and boundaries. They explained whether it is a guileless code of conduct or is it something more, something thoughtful of the real and true character of the psyche which is innate even without the influence of extraneous rules. What is at stake is whether morality is fundamentally a system of rules, which persons can observe for whatever reasons, or something that is broader in its demands a system that reaches to the ingredients of the characters or personalities of those who obey its rules . B. Morality according to philosophers i. Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant was a very perceptive and talented thinker and intellectual who do his mark in history based on what he offered to the world as important ideas in many polar fields of human way of life. His invest on morality and moral speculation is characterized by his domain of what is known as the Categorical Imperative or barely CI. For Kant, discerning what is moral or immoral is simply based on how the someone acts according to the Categorical Imperative.Being consistent with what the Categorical Imperative requires mean that the action and the individual is moral, composition varying or deviating from the Categorical Imperative is equal to being immoral. Basically, what Kant is onerous to meridian out here via his Categorical Imperative is the idea that morality is something that should be hinged on a crabby set of standards established and shared by the society pertaining to what is acceptable and what is unacceptable action. Kant rationalizes that the individual should be unbosom to pursue or deviate from the Categorical imperative.The individual is a rational being and not a being that is merely driven by emotional motors without cut intoation to reason. He or she is free and endowed with autonomy to consume the distinction in recognizing moral and immoral actions. The individual pursues what could be moral or immoral in the persons perspective and the perspective of other people or community. Kants position on morality is found in his several(prenominal) published works which have been extensively read, critiqued and reviewed by other individuals, who, like Kant are also intently pursuing the philosophical system of morality and the ideas affecting it.These include The creation of the Metaphysics of Morals, surveyed by The Critique of serviceable Reason, The Metaphysics of Morals, Anthropology from a Pragmatic pass of View. His writing entitled Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason also touches the government issue of morality and is important in moral theories. ii. Aristotle Aristotle is a thinker who has explored many incompatible aspects of human social life and has contributed many distinct important ideas. One of the things that Aristotle talked near in his works is morality. Aristotle is known for his plowshare to the philosophy of morality.Despite the fact that Aristotle is well respected as a thinker, searing compendium of his works on moral philosophy still revealed some constitute holes and weaknesses in his overall concept . nigh of the ideas that Aristotle explored with regards to morality and moral philosophy include the idea that the main consideration in morality is having people consider what is surmount for the many and not for the few. Aristotles discussion of morality is also centeringed on legality, and the consideration and authority of money and satisfying consideration and the weighing of satisfying and non material considerations when it comes to what constitutes pleasure.In turn, it is an important consideration in assessing moral and immoral actions. It can be considered that Aristotle was possible and realistic in his approach shot to explaining morality, even giving ideas in wide construction, like how it is not eas y to be true(p), as reflected in his work Nichomachean ethical motive . iii. John Stuart manufacturing planter John Stuart Mill has been considered as one of the individuals in the nineteenth century who talked about morality and provided sensitive ideas regarding morality and moral philosophy.Many intrustd that Mills ideas were actually off choose from other ideas in the past like those presented by intellectuals like John Locke and David Hume among others. Critics and analysts believe that what Mill did was consolidate some of the important ideas of these philosophers and develop and new approach in understanding morality and moral philosophy to help guide people and their way of life and way of thinking. This results to a society in tune with moral paradigms and is assisted in defining what is right and wrong actions and way of life.Mill is identified with the useful approach in moral philosophy. This path Mill believes in the idea that the morality of the action of the i ndividual is assessed by the consequences of that action which makes considerations on action utilitarian. The society settle the actions based on what it can do to the people or society. C. Similarities The leash philosophers provide moral philosophy outlooks that share sympatheticities based on what they imply and based on its signs as well. For example, tyros and analysts believe that the theories of the deuce-ace in morality are considered as normative.These are the kinds of theories that people should value and put enormousness to. Kant, Mill and Aristotle are offering normative theories theories of what we should value . The moral philosophy human body of Aristotle, Mill and Kant also shares the similar belief that part of the concept to be adept which is important in morality is the acknowledgement that it is grueling to act in such a way that is perceived by the society as good. The concept of what is difficult and what makes the actions difficult vary from one philosopher to the other .Also, morality plays an important part in Mill, Kant and Aristotles explanation of other associate concepts integral to morality, like ethics, for example . One of the similarities of the three individuals with regards to their pursuit of and contribution to the concept of morals, morality and the moral philosophy is that they are all responsible each for three diverse perspective, approaches and ideas on morals and morality based on what they have popularized. Aristotle has his Nicomachean moral philosophy dapple Kant has his Categorical Imperative.Lastly, Mill has his Utilitarianism . Kant and Mill, deuce philosophers whose lives are closer to one another compared to the disagreements in time span with that of Aristotle, has nonplus a factor that resulted in the creation of similarities in their ideas regarding moral philosophy. Larmore explained that the moral philosophy of some(prenominal) Mill and Kant are considered as liberal theories. It is c haracterized by consistent similarities in the midst of the two moral philosophies that featured ideas such as the autonomy and independence of individual in relation to morality, among others .Liberal policy-making theory since Kant and Mill has usually presented itself as an all-encompassing moral theory committed to overall personal ideals such as autonomy or an experimental spatial relation towards ways of life . Both Kant and Mill also focused on the role and importance of virtue, citing the idea that virtue is a driving force behind achieving morality. Morality, in turn, is realized because of how virtue manipulates individuals towards action. Kant and Mill both wrote about the importance of virtues.Still, in their views of morality, what makes for a virtue is the fact that the agent acts in accordance with the fundamental principle of morality . Also, another similarity, this time between Kant and Mill, is their similar use and advocacy regarding human exemption regardi ng action and the pursuit of morality. For these two individuals and their moral philosophy, an important idea postulated is that of the role of self-governing human beings being empowered by freedom to choose their actions and by themselves consider what is moral and what immoral actions are.An important characteristic of the ideas of Kant, Mill and Aristotle when it comes to moral philosophy is the shared similarity of the three which made them a incorporated whole in the analysis of moral theory and philosophy. Prinz, in his password The emotional construction of morals, explained that when moral philosophies are examined collectively, Mill, Kant and Aristotles ideas comprise a particular group from which other groups involving different ideas are compared and contrasted with.An example is how the approaches of Hume and Nietzsche are compared to the collective similar ideas of Mill, Kant and Aristotle. It is important to see that Hume and Nietzsche are doing something very dif ferent from Kant, Mill and Aristotle . D. Differences i. The different ideas In many different ways, the philosophical approaches of these three individuals vary from one another. For example, both Aristotle and Mill put forward reasonable, practical and understandable constructs and designs for their moral philosophy and the expectations of the valet and the societies in this matter.In comparison, Kant appears to be utmost(prenominal) in his ideas and in his expectations of the people and the society if his approach on moral philosophy would be followed. For example, Kant was expecting that the rest of the society and other people will rigidly follow behaviors indicative of moral behavior when the integrity is, it is more complex than this. Also, Aristotle and Mills moral philosophies are considered teleological while that of Kant is considered deontological .Others believe that Aristotle was developing something which differs from the point of focus of the works of Mill and K ant, especially in the idea that moral philosophy can be a guidebook for some, while for others simply the identification of the idea good person . ii. Differences in lieu of God, faith and morality In comparing the approaches, perspectives and moral takes of these three individuals on morality, morals and the philosophy of morality, it is noticeable how the concept of god and religion has often figured in this equating, and how the three individuals handled them differently.There is Kant who believes that the autonomous individual exercises free will and the belief that this act is a manifestation of Gods will and that reason is used to identify and understand morality. Mill, on the other hand, believes that morality does not include God in the equation and the identification of morality is dependent strongly on the consideration of the individual of his happiness or pleasure.Unlike Kant who believes that as morality is dependent on the individual, so is the individual soluble f or his actions on morality and immorality. Mill believes that the individual is not the only entity answerable in morality but society as well. It appears that Aristotle sides with the idea that morality is dependent on the conscious course of action of the individual. This creates moral virtues which in turn influences and determines actions and whether or not they lean towards morality or otherwise.In the idea of virtue, differences are found, especially in comparison to the moral philosophies of Aristotle, Kant and Mill wherein Mill and Kant are in similar standing in the idea and concept of virtue different from how Aristotle perceived it. For Aristotle, virtue is basic in a way which it is not for Kant and Mill. That is a crucial difference that is reflected in their theories as overall . Aristotle provides a very good model for morality, explaining that morality and the pursuit of moral living should be aided by other aspects of life, like education.By being educated, the ind ividual can act better in a way that morality is being considered more significantly in the actions. E. Analysis An important consideration to the understanding of, as well as appreciation, of the moral philosophies of the three moral philosophers is not bonny based on what the individual analyst or critic is experiencing at the moment and what the individual is non-white for or against. Rather, it is based on the context of use by which they are look foring to define and explain morality. It is important that regardless of their differences and similarities as ideas.All of these perspectives are based on an important foundation, and that is the reason through which the philosopher propels his or her ideas (in this case his since all three are male philosophers). As Rosenstand explained it, analysis and upbraiding of any of these ideas first require the individual to be able to understand the point of reason of these philosophers, why they are trying to say what they are saying and why this is how they see things. If we were to ask Kant, Mill, Aristotle, or just about any moral thinker, he or she would say we must try to appeal to their reason . This phenomenon, in a way, is indicative of the social condition. Societies vary from one another when it comes to their collective idea of morality as well as the differences in the personal preferences on morality. They all have their reasons why their morality and their moral philosophies are designed as it is. III. Conclusion The philosophers Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill and Aristotle are individuals and thinkers who explored and discussed morality and in the process helped people in defining standards for life and way of life.These individuals are important because people has the need to understand how they should act and under what considerations. It is an idea that is important and crucial in the concept of morality and moral philosophy. Through these individuals and their ideas which are similar and dif ferent in one or many different points, people are assumption the chance to assess their actions and see if they are good or bad depending on the moral guides that they follow. Kant, Mill and Aristotle are relation us what we should value . Bibliography Bailey, Andrew. First philosophical system Fundamental Problems and Readings in Philosophy. Toronto Broadview Press, 2004. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. The politics and morality of deviance moral panics, drug abuse, degenerate science, and reversed stigmatization. New York SUNY Press, 1990. Care, Norman S. bonnie people. Oxford Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. DAndrea, Thomas D. Tradition, rationality, and virtue the thought of Alasdair MacIntyre. Vermont Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. , 2006.